people have got classic some bangers in the replies. i’ll try and contribute something new: “guided by angels”, “it’s mine” amyl and the sniffers “dumb”, “she” pretty sick “always”, “bad dream” (the audiotree version if you can swing it) indigo de souza “romantic” mannequin pussy “berry”, “beautiful son” hole “bluebell”, “bruise violet”, “boto wrap”, “vomit heart” babes in toyland “world war x” world of pleasure “spit”, “brackish” kittie “guilt machine”, “fifth circle” faetooth
Feb 7, 2025

Comments (0)

Make an account to reply.
No comments yet

Related Recs

🕳
two girls - ringo deathstar distance - rendez vous current affair - sextile serafina - BAMBARA F.U.C.A.W. / clams - mannequin pussy HOW COLD - blu anxxiety cry baby - kitten forever
Dec 19, 2023
đŸ”±
Pay Your Rates A New Face In Hell C ‘n’ C-S Mithering 2 by 4 Prole Art Threat Slags, States, Etc. Eat Y’self Fitter (John Peel Session) Tempo House Barmy Spoilt Victorian Child Gut Of The Quantifier I am Damo Suzuki Mr Pharmacist
Oct 11, 2024
😃
pussy - lady wet vagina - doja cat tarantula - azealia banks armageddon (Mount XLR remix) - aespa, mount xlr #BU$$IN - CLIP mos thoser - food house, Gupi, Fraxiom sugar water cyanide - rebecca black this week in a nutshell.

Top Recs from @deardoveswings

🏘
liking ur rec = saying hi when we go to get our morning papers from the end of our driveways (picture me doing so tony soprano style)
Aug 12, 2024
💌
she can’t see my bank account so it’s ok.
Mar 21, 2025
đŸš«
started writing this a few hours ago when i first saw this ask, then decided against posting but i've since changed my mind. there really is no justification for it outside of entitlement. even from a selfish lens, there's no long term benefit to its usage. it harms the world and culture in more ways than one. a.) the water and energy usage that isn't a secret at this point. "no ethical consumption under capitalism" yadda yadda and yeah corporations are extremely culpable in the state of the environment but there really is no need for chatgpt and the planet is already too delicate at the moment. b.) the exploitation of workers in the global south. this program is not just a computer figuring it all out, there are in fact humans behind it. it reminds me of the acceptance of fast fashion and how people have the tendency to divorce the idea of the garment worker from the garment they wear when all clothing is handmade in some way, shape or form. you need hands to man a sewing machine, you need human eyes to moderate content. also, content moderation can be a thankless job with psychological repercussions. c.) the erosion of social skills, humanity and media literacy...this one is very personal. like, you have a cushy email job but can't write an email? you need a computer and a worker in kenya to get paid a dollar an hour to figure out a daily routine for you? i've seen the program churn out blatantly incorrect information. fine tuning a prompt or chat or whatever to give you the exact (possibly incorrect) answer you need isn't really that much less work than sharpening your research skills by cracking open a dictionary or using boolean search keys in google. again, the main issue with this kind of stuff is the entitlement to convenience, with no thought towards the repercussions within and outside of us. we are losing major recipes (critical thinking and media literacy) here, people! i probably did an iffy job are coherently articulating my thoughts here but i am in fact, human. and that’s the beauty of it all.
Oct 1, 2024