đŸ“Œ
This Austrian thriller tells the story of a young wealthy family held hostage in a gated vacation community by two sadistic young men known only as “Peter & Paul” who invite them to engage in twisted games and force them to make a bet on whether or not they will survive the night. Often breaking the fourth wall throughout the film a smirking Paul speaks directly the viewer forcing them to reflect on their own complicity as an observer of sadistic violence as entertainment.  The most interesting thing about the film, and what makes it unique is that its portrayal of violence is often implied & built up through tension. The actual act of violent aggression occurs just off screen. We cannot see what is happening but are so immersed in the experience expecting what will come that we feel every minute of it.  It’s bleak and depressing and not an easy watch. It offers no hope but it is a masterful utilization of the horror genre to make a point in questioning the morality of the consumption of violence as entertainment through its presentation of pointless and senseless torture. 
recommendation image
+4
recommendation image

Comments (2)

Make an account to reply.
image
Very few movies have made me roll my eyes harder at a director. Don’t get me wrong, it’s overall a good film, but holy hell does the director piss me off with his holier than thou “you, the viewers, are actually the real villains for watching this voyeuristic violence đŸ€­â€.
1d ago
1
image
@DIRKFUNK I don’t believe he villainizes the audience as much as he attempts to rouse inquisitions into why darkness intrigues us all together.  Why does one get the impulse to crane their head to look at roadkill or an accident? Is it a morbid curiosity in those who have never experienced real horror? Is it a sort of monkey brained survival instinct we have to garner awareness of a potential dangerous scenario. I don’t know.  The typical American slasher is also pointless but so overly grotesque it’s cartoonish and just accepted for what it is, ironic Halloweeny fun. Which I do enjoy. I think It’s hard to make any art that doesn’t have an air of pretentiousness once you assign a specific meaning or purpose to it. Theres something strangely compelling in a tale of tragedy and I think Haneke had an interesting approach in questioning that through film. Just my opinion though.
1d ago

Related Recs

recommendation image
đŸŽ„
1989 Michael Haneke's first film shocking self-destruction inspired by a true story "Not for everybody"
Jan 30, 2024
recommendation image
⭐
The countless atrocities committed by the Nazis have been well-documented in the media, but I can’t recall having ever seen a movie that opted to focus on the cold banality of the lives of the Germans who were actively engaged in or complicit with such incredible cruelty. Filmmaker Jonathan Glazer (Under the Skin), inspired by Martin Amis’ novel, has decided to tap into this underexplored area, and the chilling result will haunt viewers for days. Focusing on Auschwitz commandant Rudolf Höss (Christian Freidel) and his wife Hedwig (Sandra HĂŒller, both perfectly cast), who are raising their family in a well-appointed home directly adjacent to the camp, we watch them go about their relatively mundane existences. They live better than many of their fellow Germans and have local girls working as servants to help keep up the house, but otherwise much of their time is spent tending to trivial day-to-day tasks, aside from the odd bit of Nazi business that Rudolf attends to from his home office. Nothing here is truly normal however, a point made very clear shortly into the film when the camera changes its view of the family’s yard to expose the guard tower just on the other side of the brick wall that abuts the property. Given the proximity to the notorious camp, its noises permeate every aspect of the family’s lives. The low hum of the furnaces is ever-present, punctuated by screams and gunshots. Frequently trains can be heard bringing more prisoners, puffs of steam appearing over the tree line. Somehow, the Höss’ and their children go about their day as if they don’t even notice it. To celebrate one of the children’s birthdays, Hedwig’s mother comes to stay. Initially impressed by the large, well-maintained home and garden, she casually wonders aloud if a Jewish neighbor might be imprisoned next door, complaining that she lost her chance to claim her curtains. As the pair sit on the patio and sounds from the camp impose themselves, she turns to glance at the wall, at least a little discomfited. At night, the sounds of suffering disturb her sleep and she looks out the window, only to see ash and bright flames erupting from a smokestack. She leaves the following morning. While the atrocities next door are felt throughout almost the entire movie, we never see them. Everything is instead conveyed through Johnnie Burn’s meticulous sound design and the effect is powerful, especially in contrast to the mundanity of everything shown. Cinematographer Ɓukasz Ć»al’s striking staging avoids overly prettifying the home while still maintaining a painterly artfulness, often using static, embedded cameras to give the proceedings the sort of voyeuristic feel of reality shows like Big Brother. A movie may not be the best place to figure out exactly how people can react so blithely to such large-scale inhumanity, so Glazer doesn’t really try to do so. It is enough however to be reminded that the behavior is not only something that we as a species are capable of, but that it is necessary for such evil to be enacted. Hopefully the reminder will help to prevent it from happening again. ★★★★★ RATED PG-13 FOR THEMATIC MATERIAL, SOME SUGGESTIVE MATERIAL, AND SMOKING.
Feb 21, 2024
recommendation image
🩌
i have such a hard time getting through movies, its brutal and unfortunate. i am fully aware im missing out on some critical pieces of art in consequence, but if isnt both predominantly psychological thriller and as quickly paced as oppenheimer, its super hard to keep me engaged. i will talk about this movie until the end of time. despite minimal dialogue and the most clinical atmosphere to be captured by means of cinematography, the lack of information and consequential unpredictability kept me thoroughly enticed and fully unnerved for the full two hours. minimalism weaponized for max intensity with no certain direction; epitomization of surrealist thriller. watching it for the first time without context nor any expectations is an invaluable experience.
Nov 26, 2024

Top Recs from @visceralsuspicion

recommendation image
😃
I made it for a friend, inspired by his cat Hazel.
recommendation image
💐
For any occasion, even a tuesday. Get some flowers - buy em’ pick em’ - just put them in your house. Take some out of the bouquet before they die and hang them up to dry so you can keep them forever. Not only does a nice flower arrangement brighten up the room but it makes your life feel a little more romantic.
🐊
A friend and I randomly decided to get a tattoo, because why not? The shop we had in mind wasn’t taking walk in’s that day so we had to stop by a few more before finding one that would. I ended up getting on with the artist I found who was willing to do it. I had a crocodile tattoo and he was the proud owner of several reptiles. We started hanging out for a while, he’s a great guy and all but the relationship didn't flourish and we didn’t stay close for long. Here’s the thing, I was looking to get some graphic tees printed at the time and he had recommended me to a screen printer. That screen printer and I ended up having more in common than I could have ever imagined. We bonded over art, science fiction, new wave & heavy metal music to name a few things and eventually we started dating. On our first date we built model spaceships out of junk & now we’ve been together for 5 years. You never really know how and when you'll meet someone.