Why not go through the process of blending those images yourself? Why not use process as an experiment? Why AI? What part are you playing? What makes it yours? I think AI is impersonal. I think it is unethical when it has relied on the theft of actual people’s actual physical (and because of the nature of art, often time emotional) labor. I also think it is unnecessary in creating art. I also think the environmental impacts are atrocious. I also think AI’s biggest supporters are being maliciously ignorant because it’s a fun new toy. Is it ease? Is it efficiency? People talk about accessibility as if children don’t use crayons and stickers! As if graffiti artists don’t use postal labels as sticker, as if sand mandalas don’t exist, as if cardboard and tape aren’t in over abundance.
Apr 15, 2025

Comments (9)

Make an account to reply.
image
art without some kind of struggle to create isn‘t art that I wanna see ! how can I feel anything from that if I know no one put energy and time into doing something they love?
Apr 15, 2025
8
image
the best, most succinct take i’ve seen yet. truly one of the most important things about art is the process…i think of the uptick of this generated “art” sort of the same way as the sentiment that painters wouldn’t have a job anymore upon the advent of the camera (though the camera is its own medium and actually cool)
Apr 15, 2025
6
image
@DEARDOVESWINGS but generated art doesn’t have nearly as much human intent as a photograph. and you don’t have to pay nearly as much for AI as you would for human touch Which IS leading to people losing jobs. no disrespect to you because I’ve seen this argument a few times now,but I think that comparison is half baked and dismissive to the bigger issues. I see what you mean, but there have been plenty of amazing, creative, inventive photographers while the ethics of AI are at the forefront in this day and age. You didn’t need to steal art to create a photograph, the environmental impact over the last 100 years of photography doesn’t rival what tech industries are doing jow
Apr 15, 2025
3
image
@DEARDOVESWINGS yes yes yes… i feel like the part on process also pairs well with thinking about the anti-abstract art (and anti-art adjacent to abstract) sentiments i see a lot of online. i saw this thing recently about yves klein and how he invented IKB and people (today on the internet) were like ”who cares it’s just blue” !!! everything is so automatic to us we’re losing touch with the idea of process and its importance and meaning
Apr 15, 2025
3
image
@UGLIESTBINCH i’m totally in agreement with you! which is why i was careful to liken it to the sentiment not the practice itself. i was having a convo with another artist acquaintance recently and it’s more like the sort of people who defend gen ai are also the same ones in our dms unhappy with prices and end up getting mad at artist for knowing their worth. these people feel an entitlement towards art and creation and sometimes a accompanying smugness towards artists. it will no doubt fuck w jobs but all i can do is keep drawing and make weird faces at people who sing praises about it irl.
Apr 15, 2025
3
image
@MARXINISTA the process is what helps the artist grow and create. it also just feel miraculous to finish a piece sometimes and the pro-ai heads will never be able to truly replicate that so i sleep decent. i really do loathe the “i could’ve done that” kind of people. you’d think people would have grown out of that by now.
Apr 15, 2025
3
image
@DEARDOVESWINGS sorry guys my @ feature was acting funky thank you both for the tidbits of thought <3
Apr 15, 2025
image
@DEARDOVESWINGS my b! I realize I misread part of your comment! speaking of price tho, have you seen what some independent ai creators are charging for prints??? I saw one a while back that was prints of AI generated fashion for 200$!!! They were big prints, but still!
Apr 15, 2025
2
image
@DEARDOVESWINGS OMG that’s so it. gen ai art is empowering the “i could’ve done that” people further because they think getting a computer to do a soulless uncanny version of an art piece is “doing it” themselves
Apr 15, 2025
4

Related Recs

👎
you can do whatever you want, but if you really want to hear my opinion on it... at best, ai-art is demoralizing to actual human beings and creates novelty slop that vaugely looks like an art piece, while not harboring any skill in using it. and theres nothing wrong with not wanting to make art fir the skill of it, though. but at worst, it's an environmental and economic disaster, a predatory business model to consumers and customers of AI, and a great way for businessmen to try and take creativity away from us to turn us into cogs in the machine. it's built off of the stolen work of artists who already struggled to make a living, now forced out by a tool that's turned on them with their own work. it can help make propaganda that is virtually unidentifiable, turn victims into deepfakes, and generally evil we have yet to see. and that's just the image side of things, but the cons of all types of ai models overlap. I've had to watch people throw away their lifelong dreams because of this garbage. it's no coincidence elonely muskrat and every ceo you can think of are obsessed with it - it's a perverse business tool. I wouldn't mind coexisting with it if it wasn't out to get me. but it is. I also feel like it's the reason nobody makes fun photobashes or random photoshops anymore. it will never fully phase out human art but I think it's starting to take over the photography world, especially commercially. I'm sick of  looking up real places and animals and sorting through fake slop im being told is real.
Apr 14, 2025
🤖
IMO. Solution without a problem yet. I personally think AI art looks like shit too. Part of the joy of art is knowing that a human created this and trying to unpack after around that like what were the influences, what were they trying to convey. AI will never be able to explain WHY it produced something in a satisfying way. In fact, from what I can tell, it's almost IMPOSSIBLE for anyone to be able to explain how a LLM generated the answer at it did. (but I could be wrong). My response to most AI art is "wow those colors are really rich" or "this is so creepy." On the margins I think there could be some efficiency gains (stuff like "take this complicated piece of data and summarize it for human consumption") that could change industries, but I think at this point it's mostly vaporware. And if general AI is ever let out into the wild god save us all.
Mar 1, 2024
recommendation image
😃
AI is garbage for so many reasons and none of us should be using it. that includes making art as well as seemingly mundane corporate tasks. it’s atrocious for the planet, it’s horrific for the uncredited workers who labor to power it, it bulldozes all notions of “privacy” and further fast-tracks the commodification of humanity, and it‘s fueling the dumpster fire that is an entire generation of brains raised in the cesspool of the internet.
Jan 13, 2025

Top Recs from @ugliestbinch

😬
Maybe this isn’t so much a fix for staff, but I feel like the reposting of things has gotten a bit lame. I don’t want the “Everyone” feed to be the same post 20 times with nothing added, especially when the thing being re-rec’d isn’t even a real reccomendation in the first place. I like this app because it is different than Instagram and Twitter and tumblr and the like. I feel like people are trying to interact similarly to those other apps here. I feel like we are all drifting back into creating the same social media AGAIN. My vote would be to remove the feature entirely, but I see how it can be used thoughtfully
Mar 3, 2025
recommendation image
😃
I like to make jewelry that would fulfill my inner child’s wishlist! I also sell the jewelry and I like to do silly photoshoots and edit the pictures to show it off. Like tow arts in one
Jan 16, 2025